Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 31721

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case Series
Year : 2023 | Month : October | Volume : 17 | Issue : 10 | Page : SR01 - SR04 Full Version

Spectrum of Growth Hormone Disorders in Children: A Case Series of 5 Cases


Published: October 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/66866.18513
Anshuman, Amit Kumar, Rakesh Kumar, Rizwan Ahmar, Jayant Prakash

1. Senior Resident, Department of Paediatrics, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India. 3. Additional Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India. 4. Additional Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India. 5. Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India.

Correspondence Address :
Amit Kumar,
Room No-201, Paediatrics Office, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna-800014, Bihar, India.
E-mail: amitpmch@rediffmail.com

Abstract

Growth Hormone Deficiency (GHD) is one of the most important treatable endocrine causes of short stature. A problem anywhere in the Growth Hormone (GH) - Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 (IGF-1) axis can lead to short stature. Childhood GH deficiency can be congenital, acquired, or idiopathic. Hereby, the authors present a case series consisting of five cases of short stature, aimed to provide an overview of the spectrum of GH-related disorders. All five patients presented to the Paediatric Endocrinology Outpatient Department of a tertiary care Institute with complaints of not gaining height. The patients in present case series had significant short stature (Z score for height <-3 SD (Standard Deviation) in each case). These patients were suspected of having GH deficiency based on clinical presentation and investigations. After a proper diagnostic work-up and GH stimulation tests, cases 1 to 4 were found to have GH deficiency. The 5th case was suspected of having Laron Syndrome based on high GH levels and low IGF-1. There were subtle differences in the spectrum of GH deficiency. The 1st case had Multiple Pituitary Hormone Deficiency (MPHD). Cases 2 to 4 had Isolated Growth Hormone Deficiency (IGHD). Case 2 had findings of pituitary stalk interruption on brain imaging. We found a genetic association in the 3rd case, while the 4th case had almost normal brain imaging. Cases 1 to 4 received GH therapy, and all showed appreciable height gain. These subtle differences can sometimes make the diagnosis difficult, and often a different approach to treatment is required.

Keywords

Diagnosis, Genetic, Panhypopituitarism, Short stature

Growth Hormone (GH) is the most important hormone responsible for linear growth in children. GH has a limited role in intrauterine growth. The major effect of GH on linear growth starts after infancy. GH is secreted from the anterior pituitary in a pulsatile fashion, with GH-Releasing Hormone (GHRH), which is secreted from the hypothalamus, having a positive control over GH secretion. GH acts on the liver to produce IGF-1, which acts on the type-1 IGF receptors on the growth plates, resulting in height gain (1). GH also directly affects cartilage cells in the growth plates of long bones, in addition to the production of local IGF-1. A problem anywhere in the GH-IGF1 axis can lead to significant short stature. Childhood GH deficiency can be congenital, acquired, or idiopathic. GH deficiency can be isolated or associated with deficiencies of other pituitary hormones (panhypopituitarism) (2). Rarely, other disorders of the GH-IGF1 axis, like Laron syndrome, can also cause severe short stature (3).

The present case series aimed to provide an overview of short stature in children due to different spectrums of GH-related disorders.

Case Report

Case 1

A six-year eight-month-old male child presented to the Paediatric Endocrinology Outpatient Department with the chief complaint of not gaining weight and height for the last three years. General physical and systemic examinations were normal. Birth history was normal, and there was no history of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) admission. Patients anthropometric findings were suggestive of short stature. Anthropometric data were analysed using the MedEClasses Endocrinology application on Android (4).

The height was 95 cm (height Standard Deviation Score (SDS) -4.69), and the weight was 15 kg (-2.48 SDS). Patients height age was three years, and weight age was three years nine months (chronological age > weight age > height age). So, height was more affected than weight. Mid-parental height was 158.5 cm (father’s height 160 cm, mother’s height 144 cm). Routine blood investigations, blood gas, coelic profile, urine, and chest X-ray were normal. However, Thyroid Function Tests (TFT) showed normal Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH)=0.9 mIU/L (normal value <5 mIU/L) and low free thyroxine (FT4)=0.54 ng/dL (Normal value=0.7 to 1.8 ng/dL) (5), suggestive of central hypothyroidism. Patients 8 am serum cortisol was 4.2 microgram/dL (Normal range is 5-23 mcg/dL), and Adrenocorticotropic (ACTH) less than 5 picogram/mL (Normal value is 7.2-63.3 pg/mL) was also low (6),(7). The baseline IGF-1 level was also 12.2 ng/mL, which is low for the age and sex (age-wise normal values to be used) (8). The GH stimulation test (after treatment with steroid and thyroxine) with clonidine (5 microgram/kg) showed peak GH levels to be very low (30 min - 0.7 ng/mL, 60 min - 0.4 ng/mL, 90 min - 0.9 ng/mL, and 120 min - 0.8 ng/mL) (more than 10 ng/mL considered as normal) (9). Patients left wrist X-ray showed a bone age of around three years. Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CEMRI) of the brain in a T1-weighted (T1W) image showed a small bright spot near the upper end of the infundibulum. The pituitary fossa was empty, suggestive of an ectopic posterior pituitary with hypoplasia/aplasia of the anterior pituitary (Table/Fig 1)a,b.

Based-on clinical, laboratory, and radiological findings, the child was diagnosed as a case of MPHD. Other differentials kept were traumatic injury, neoplastic disorders, and infectious causes, which were easily ruled out based on history and investigations. Initially, treatment was started with hydrocortisone at a dose of 10 mg/day in three divided dosages (10-15 mg/m2/day), followed by levothyroxine 50 mcg daily empty stomach (3-5 mcg/kg/day) after two weeks of starting the hydrocortisone. After one week, subcutaneous GH therapy (Norditropin) was started at a dose of 0.3 mg/day at bedtime (0.024-0.034 mg/kg/day). Height after one year of GH therapy was 106 cm (gain of 10 cm).

Case 2

An eleven-year-three-month-old female child visited the Paediatric Endocrinology clinic with short stature. Birth history was normal with no history of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) admission. General physical and systemic examinations were normal. Patients anthropometry showed a height of 106 cm (Height SDS=-4.69) and weight of 20 kg (Weight SDS=-2.78). Routine investigations, celiac profile, and chest X-ray were normal. Patient left wrist x-ray revealed her bone age to be around seven years ten months. Thyroid Function Tests (TFT) were normal. Serum cortisol (10.3 microg/dL) and ACTH (10.12 pg/mL) were normal. A GH stimulation test with clonidine (5 microg/kg) was done after priming with three consecutive days of oral conjugated oestrogen (2 mg). Patients basal GH level was low (0.12 ng/mL) along with low IGF-1 levels (8.6 ng/mL). GH after stimulation showed low peak GH values at 30 minutes (0.24 ng/mL), 60 minutes (0.78 ng/mL), 90 minutes (1.84 ng/mL), and 120 minutes (0.9 ng/mL). CEMRI of the brain showed a hypoplastic sella with a small anterior pituitary and ectopic posterior pituitary in the median eminence with non visualised pituitary stalk (pituitary stalk interruption syndrome), and the cerebellar tonsil appeared to be herniated into the foramen magnum (Table/Fig 2).

Based on the above clinical, laboratory, and radiological features, the child was diagnosed as a case of GHD, and subsequently, subcutaneous GH was started at a dose of 0.5 mg/day at bedtime. There was a height gain of 4.3 cm in 1st six months of treatment on follow-up.

Case 3

A 10-year-old male, who had not been gaining height and weight for a long duration, visited Outpatient Department seeking possible treatment. Patients general physical and systemic examinations were normal. Anthropometry results revealed a height of 107 cm (Height SDS=-5.05) and a weight of 19 kg (Weight SDS=-2.90). The mid-parental height was 167 cm. Thyroid Function Test (TFT) results were normal, with TSH levels at 3.19 mIU/L and FT4 levels at 1.02 ng/mL. Serum cortisol levels were also normal, measuring 11.02 mg/dL. However, basal GH levels were low (0.17 ng/mL), as were IGF-1 (Insulin-like Growth Factor 1) levels (16.2 ng/mL).

To further evaluate the patient, a GH stimulation test was conducted using tab clonidine (five microgram/kg) after priming with a single Intramuscular testosterone injection (25 mg). The test showed low values at 30 minutes (0.18 ng/mL), 60 minutes (0.43 ng/mL), 90 minutes (0.38 ng/mL), and 120 minutes (0.34 ng/mL). A CEMRI of the brain revealed a partially empty sella with hypoplasia of the anterior pituitary gland (Table/Fig 3).

Genetic analysis using clinical exome sequencing identified a homozygous nonsense variation in exon 3 of the Growth Hormone Releasing Hormone Receptor (GHRHR) gene on chromosome 7. This pathogenic variant is associated with the diagnosis of IGHD (Isolated Growth Hormone Deficiency) type 4 (AR) variant, OMIM#618157. The patient was confirmed to have IGHD and was initiated on subcutaneous daily GH therapy at a dose of 0.4 mg/day. After eight months of therapy, there was a remarkable gain of 11 cm in height.

Case 4

The fourth case involves a nine-year-old male child who was brought by his parents due to concerns about his lack of height and weight gain. Upon examination, no abnormalities were found. Anthropometric evaluation showed a height of 100 cm (Height SDS=-5.157) and a weight of 15 kg (Weight SDS=-3.522). The mid-parental height was 161.5 cm, with the father’s height measuring 163 cm and the mother’s height measuring 147 cm.

Routine blood investigations, blood gas analysis, thyroid profile, celiac profile, serum cortisol, serum ACTH, urine examination, and chest X-ray all yielded normal results. Left wrist and hand X-ray indicated a bone age of approximately six years. A GH stimulation test was performed using clonidine (5 mg/kg). The basal GH level was 0.12 ng/mL, and IGF-1 levels were less than 20 ng/mL. GH levels after stimulation showed low peak values at 30 minutes (0.08 ng/mL), 60 minutes (0.12 ng/mL), 90 minutes (0.35 ng/mL), and 120 minutes (0.47 ng/mL). CEMRI of the brain revealed normal results, with the pituitary structures appearing normal (Table/Fig 4). Based-on the clinical, laboratory, and radiological features mentioned above, the child was diagnosed with GHD and subcutaneous GH therapy was initiated. Patient started receiving daily GH injections at a dose of 0.4 mg/day, administered subcutaneously at bedtime. During the first year of treatment, there was a notable gain of 7 cm in height.

Case 5

A seven-year-old female presented to the Paediatric Endocrinology Outpatient Department with severe short stature, measuring 94 cm in height (height SDS=-4.34) and weighing 14 kg (weight SDS=-2.53). The child showed normal development in other aspects. Investigations for chronic diseases, metabolic disorders, and nutritional factors yielded negative results. The bone age was determined to be three years, and thyroid function was normal. A GH stimulation test was performed on the child, revealing a high basal GH level of 46 ng/mL and a low IGF-1 level of less than 20 ng/mL. All values of stimulated GH were high. Based on these findings, Laron syndrome (a signaling pathway defect of the GH-IGF1 axis) was suspected in the patient. Neuro imaging was not conducted, and the patient was referred to higher centres to explore the possibility of IGF-1 therapy. The present case highlighted the challenge of differentiating between Laron syndrome and GH deficiency, as they present with similar clinical features. A thorough work-up is necessary as the baseline GH levels can be normal or high in such cases, potentially delaying the diagnosis if not given proper attention. (Table/Fig 5) provides a summary of the characteristics of all five cases (8),(9).

Discussion

The diagnosis of GHD should not be based on random GH values alone, as GH is secreted in a pulsatile manner. Instead, stimulated GH values should be used. A comprehensive diagnostic algorithm for children with short stature includes taking a proper history, conducting anthropometric measurements, assessing bone age, and performing investigations to rule out chronic illnesses (10). Specialised tests for diagnosing GHD include measuring IGF-I and IGF Binding Protein 3 (IGFBP-3), performing provocative GH testing, conducting cranial imaging, and considering genetic testing if warranted (11),(12). The GH provocative or stimulation tests are the cornerstone for diagnosing GH deficiency and should be performed in all patients before initiating GH therapy. Various methods, such as clonidine, levodopa, arginine, insulin, glucagon, etc., can be used for stimulation tests. Stimulation tests using oral clonidine are relatively safe and easy to administer. It is recommended to perform sequential stimulation tests using two stimulating agents to confirm the diagnosis, unless the clinical presentation and radiological findings strongly indicate GH deficiency or the stimulated GH levels are significantly low (with a cut-off of 10 ng/mL) (9). Sex steroid 3priming before GH stimulation tests, although controversial, is generally recommended for children around the age of puberty (13).

Genetic testing may be indicated in specific cases, particularly idiopathic, isolated, or familial GHD. IGHD can be classified as sporadic and familial. IGHD can be further subdivided into three categories: IA (OMIM: 262400) and IB (OMIM: 612781) with autosomal recessive inheritance, II (OMIM: 173100) with autosomal dominant inheritance, and III (OMIM: 307200) with X-linked inheritance (14).

Recombinant human Growth Hormone (rhGH) is initiated in children as soon as the diagnosis is confirmed, with a recommended dose of 0.16 to 0.24 mg/kg/week administered daily via subcutaneous injections. GH therapy leads to significant catch-up growth, and if treatment begins early, almost normal height can be achieved (15).

In a study conducted by Bajpai et al., it was demonstrated that the maximum catch-up growth occurs during the first two years of GH treatment. The study suggested that a minimum treatment duration of two years is necessary to achieve proper catch-up growth (16). Desai MP et al., found that genetic background is more likely to be associated with congenital GHD. While genetic evaluation is not mandatory for diagnosing GH deficiency, it can be useful in cases of idiopathic and familial GHD (17). In a case report by Boro H et al., the diagnosis and treatment of Laron syndrome were described. Laron syndrome is characterised by GH insensitivity or primary IGF-1 deficiency. The clinical presentation is similar to GHD, with features such as short stature, delayed bone age, and hypoglycemia (18). Due to the significant variability in the presentation of different GHD patients, it is important to perform all indicated investigations before initiating treatment. Ideally, treatment should be continued until the expected height is achieved or the bony epiphyses are fused. However, if cost constraints are a concern, a minimum treatment duration of two years is required to observe any significant beneficial effects. Regular monitoring during GH therapy is also crucial (16). An important point to consider is that initiating thyroxine supplementation without prior administration of steroids in cases of MPHD can be life-threatening (19).

Conclusion

Growth Hormone Deficiency (GHD) is the second most common endocrine cause of short stature, following hypothyroidism, as reported in several studies. GHD can occur in isolation or be associated with a deficiency of other pituitary hormones, leading to panhypopituitarism. Well-defined guidelines exist for the evaluation of GHD, emphasising the importance of not relying solely on random GH levels for diagnosis. The present case series highlights the significance of an algorithmic approach to diagnosing short stature, the ease of GH stimulation tests, the variability of presentations among GH-deficient children, and the importance of early initiation of GH therapy. Despite all the cases presenting with short stature, authors can observe different spectrums of GH disorders in each case. It is evident that GH therapy resulted in significant height gain.

References

1.
Blum WF, Alherbish A, Alsagheir A, El Awwa A, Kaplan W, Koledova E, et al. The growth hormone-insulin-like growth factor-I axis in the diagnosis and treatment of growth disorders. Endocr Connect. 2018;7(6):R212-22. Doi: 10.1530/EC-18-0099. Epub 2018 May 3. PMID: 29724795; PMCID: PMC5987361.[crossref][PubMed]
2.
Kim JH, Chae HW, Chin SO, Ku CR, Park KH, Lim DJ, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of growth hormone deficiency: A position statement from Korean endocrine society and Korean society of pediatric endocrinology. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2020;35(2):272-87. Doi: 10.3803/EnM.2020.35.2.272. Epub 2020 Jun 24. PMID: 32615711; PMCID: PMC7386113. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Murray PG, Clayton PE. Disorders of growth hormone in Childhood. [Updated 2022 Mar 9]. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, et al., editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK278971/.
4.
https://learning.growsociety.in/mobile-app/endocrinology.
5.
Wassner AJ, Smith JR. Disorders of thyroid gland. In: Kliegman RM, St. Geme JW. editors. Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. 21st edition. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2020:2912-2943.
6.
https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/2088826-overview.
7.
https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/articles/23151-adrenocorticotropic- hormone-acth.
8.
https://www.pathology.med.umich.edu/handbook/#/details/855.
9.
Vyas V, Kumar A, Jain V. Growth hormone deficiency in children: From suspecting to diagnosing. Indian Pediatr. 2017;54(11):955-60. Doi: 10.1007/s13312-017- 1190-3. PMID: 29217803. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Rani D, Shrestha R, Kanchan T, et al. Short Stature. [Updated 2023 Mar 13]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK556031/.
11.
Stanley T. Diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in childhood. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2012;19(1):47-52. Doi: 10.1097/MED.0b013 e32834ec952. PMID: 22157400; PMCID: PMC3279941. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
John M, Koledova E, Kumar KM, Chaudhari H. Challenges in the diagnosis and management of growth hormone deficiency in India. Int J Endocrinol. 2016;2016:2967578. Doi: 10.1155/2016/2967578. Epub 2016 Oct 27. PMID: 27867396; PMCID: PMC5102730. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
O’Neill C, Gangat M, Radovick S. Growth hormone deficiency. Endocrines. 2022;3(4):736-44. https://doi.org/10.3390/endocrines3040060. [crossref]
14.
Mullis PE. Genetics of growth hormone deficiency. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2007;36(1):17-36. Doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2006.11.010. PMID: 17336732. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Briana C, Felnar P. Hypopituitarism. In: Kliegman RM, St. Geme JW. editors. Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. 21st edition. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2020:2880-2887.
16.
Bajpai A, Kabra M, Gupta AK, Menon PS. Growth pattern and skeletal maturation following growth hormone therapy in growth hormone deficiency: Factors influencing outcome. Indian Pediatr. 2006;43(7):593-99. PMID: 16891678.
17.
Desai MP, Mithbawkar SM, Upadhye PS, Rao SC, Bhatia V, Vijaykumar M. Molecular genetic studies in isolated growth hormone deficiency (IGHD). Indian J Pediatr. 2013;80(8):623-30. Doi: 10.1007/s12098-013-0982-2. Epub 2013 Feb 23. PMID: 23436191. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Boro H, Hammadur Rahman SK, Khatiwada S, Alam S, Khadgawat R. Laron syndrome: An experience of treatment of two cases. J Clin Transl Endocrinol Case Rep. 2021;19:100076. ISSN 2214-6245, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jecr.2020.100076.(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S2214624520300216). [crossref]
19.
Profka E, Rodari G, Giacchetti F, Giavoli C. GH deficiency and replacement therapy in hypopituitarism: Insight into the relationships with other hypothalamic-pituitary axes. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:678778. Doi: 10.3389/ fendo.2021.678778. PMID: 34737721; PMCID: PMC8560895.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/66866.18513

Date of Submission: Aug 08, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Sep 02, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Sep 20, 2023
Date of Publishing: Oct 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Aug 08, 2023
• Manual Googling: Sep 07, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Sep 16, 2023 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com